During development I encountered a caveat: Opus 4.5 can’t test or view a terminal output, especially one with unusual functional requirements. But despite being blind, it knew enough about the ratatui terminal framework to implement whatever UI changes I asked. There were a large number of UI bugs that likely were caused by Opus’s inability to create test cases, namely failures to account for scroll offsets resulting in incorrect click locations. As someone who spent 5 years as a black box Software QA Engineer who was unable to review the underlying code, this situation was my specialty. I put my QA skills to work by messing around with miditui, told Opus any errors with occasionally a screenshot, and it was able to fix them easily. I do not believe that these bugs are inherently due to LLM agents being better or worse than humans as humans are most definitely capable of making the same mistakes. Even though I myself am adept at finding the bugs and offering solutions, I don’t believe that I would inherently avoid causing similar bugs were I to code such an interactive app without AI assistance: QA brain is different from software engineering brain.
3014248810http://paper.people.com.cn/rmrb/pc/content/202602/27/content_30142488.htmlhttp://paper.people.com.cn/rmrb/pad/content/202602/27/content_30142488.html11921 贯彻落实党中央部署要求 精心组织开好十四届全国人大四次会议
。关于这个话题，heLLoword翻译官方下载提供了深入分析
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
对比之下，Anthropic 这次发布会，选择了截然不同的姿态。它没有再强调「取代」，而是大力宣传与现有 SaaS 厂商的深度集成与联合开发，与 Thomson Reuters 共建法律智能体，与 Salesforce、Slack、FactSet 深度打通，与 PwC 联合将企业级智能体引入 CFO 办公室。